Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 20:16:08 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Cc: vadim@tversu.ac.ru Subject: Re: EFS Message-ID: <199610311916.UAA17076@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <961031104344.ZM11456@Gatekeeper.Lamb.net> from Ulf Zimmermann at "Oct 31, 96 10:43:43 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Ulf Zimmermann wrote: (efs unstable) > I never did that observation on 5.3, also not 6.2. Irix is for me > one of the best unix machines there you can press the reset button. Except they don't have a reset button (well, only a fairly hidden one). The posted opinion is just my experience, i've seen more than one efs partition gone with nobody really knowing what has been all damaged. (The 5.3 systems used to crash very often with thei alpha-quality ISDN driver.) All this is history for me, it's been at my former employer, and they've meanwhile trashed the Indys. But it makes me reluctant about the purpose behind an `efs' implementation for us... IMHO, ufs is much more stable, at least the BSD implementation. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610311916.UAA17076>