Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 12:58:29 -0600 From: "Michael K. Sanders" <msanders@confusion.net> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, bright@rush.net Subject: Re: Some ideas on the evolution of -CURRENT Message-ID: <199904301858.MAA98176@shell.aros.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Apr 1999 19:07:06 %2B0200." <19990430190706.A11334@bitbox.follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990430190706.A11334@bitbox.follo.net>, Eivind Eklund writes: [ ... LFS ... ] >> Several other people have commented that NetBSD has got it going. >> How difficult would it be to merge the NetBSD stuff? > >Very - the problems are in the directions the VM system has taken. >NetBSDs work in this area is unlikely to be useful, I think - AFAIK, >even with UVM they haven't gone to a fully merged VM/buffer cache. I >would be happy to be proved wrong, of course. It's not unified yet, but work is being done in that area. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904301858.MAA98176>