Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:08:00 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Kip Macy <kmacy@netapp.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, joe@freebsd.org, bde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb header not c++ friendly. Message-ID: <20020219080800.GI12136@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10202182352480.16795-100000@cranford> References: <20020219074842.GH12136@elvis.mu.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10202182352480.16795-100000@cranford>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Kip Macy <kmacy@netapp.com> [020218 23:53] wrote: > > > "struct usb_device_info" has a field "u_int8_t class" this causes > > C++ to barf. any suggestions? > > > Don't use reserved keywords. uh, yeah.... it's not my header. It's the system header <sys/dev/usb/usb.h> it's gonna suck having to write a seperate C file instead of just being able to include my C++ one. Would this be acceptable? Index: usb.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/usb/usb.h,v retrieving revision 1.29 diff -u -r1.29 usb.h --- usb.h 16 Feb 2002 00:51:26 -0000 1.29 +++ usb.h 19 Feb 2002 08:13:17 -0000 @@ -593,7 +593,11 @@ u_int16_t productNo; u_int16_t vendorNo; u_int16_t releaseNo; +#ifdef __cplusplus + u_int8_t _class; +#else u_int8_t class; +#endif u_int8_t subclass; u_int8_t protocol; u_int8_t config; -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020219080800.GI12136>