Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 13:15:54 GMT From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) To: danh@wzrd.com (Dan Harnett) Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Other outstanding vulnerabilities Message-ID: <384913e7.733706143@mail.sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <MAIL19991203153353.5FB085D026@mail.wzrd.com> References: <3.0.5.32.19991202154308.01bc93c0@staff.sentex.ca> <MAIL19991203153353.5FB085D026@mail.wzrd.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 Dec 1999 10:34:35 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.misc you wrote: >Hello, > >It has been my experience that the setsockopt() DoS can be avoided by setting >NMBCLUSTERS to a reasonably high level and setting a limit on the number of Hi, Whats a reasonably high number ? Thanks, ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) Sentex Communications Corp, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?384913e7.733706143>