Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 12:02:14 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Michael Robinson <robinson@netrinsics.com> Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp Subject: Re: Which LAN PCCARD for FreeBSD (no PAO!) Message-ID: <199903281902.MAA08303@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199903281004.SAA26481@netrinsics.com> References: <36FDF5A7.417600CC@sky.rim.or.jp> <199903281004.SAA26481@netrinsics.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp> writes: > >We should re-hack PAO code to separate by functionallity. And let's > >post -mobile and -current for reviewing. > > I think that would be an excellent idea. Break up PAO into self-contained > diffs against the 3.1 tree, based on single units of functionality. This is what I did for almost 18 months, but unfortunately what happened was that any changes I made to make it fit into the FreeBSD model better were rejected by PAO, even good changes. :( This is just one of the many reasons I don't do laptop support on FreeBSD anymore (but only one of them). And, based on recent feedback I've had with PAO members, it seems that the same sort of behavior would happen again due to the difficulties in communicating and design methodologies. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903281902.MAA08303>