Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 20:24:50 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com> Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Current ready for prime time web server ? Message-ID: <v04011700b294a8fe9543@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <199812092149.NAA51668@rah.star-gate.com> References: Your message of "Wed, 09 Dec 1998 13:14:43 PST." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812091310080.463-100000@alive.znep.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 1:49 PM -0800 12/9/98, Amancio Hasty wrote: > May ask why do you think that 3.0 is not ready for prime time? Isn't true that -- *by definition* -- the freebsd-current tree is not *recommended* for production servers? Not now, not ever? Marc merely said that that he would not really recommend using -current for production servers right now. He isn't necessarily casting aspersions on 3.0. I assumed that he was just stating the official freebsd position. Now, there are things in current which could be very nice to have on a web server, including a production web server. I do use an earlier snapshot of 3.0 for a production (non-web) server I have, for instance. But for the problem as described, it does seem that simply recompiling apache was the best recommendation. --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04011700b294a8fe9543>