Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:23:54 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> To: bapt@FreeBSD.org, mexas@bristol.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg: sqlite: no such column: infos (pkgdb.c:1086) Message-ID: <201306251423.r5PENsE2016716@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130625140146.GA93612@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com Tue Jun 25 15:20:11 2013 On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:57:16PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > From baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com Tue Jun 25 14:52:59 2013 >=20 > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:22:31PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I'm debugging X11 on sparc64. > > I need to roll the ports tree back to 319054. > > On downgrading pkg I get: > > > > > Running ldconfig > > /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib > > > Registering installation for pkg-1.0.12_1 > > pkg: warning: database version 19 is newer than libpkg(3) version 12, = but=3D > still > > compatible > > pkg: sqlite: no such column: infos (pkgdb.c:1086) > > pkg-static: warning: database version 19 is newer than libpkg(3) versi= on =3D > 12, but > > still compatible > > Installing pkg-1.0.12_1...pkg-static: sqlite: table packages has no co= lum=3D > n named > > infos (pkgdb.c:1757) > > pkg-static: sqlite: cannot rollback - no transaction is active (pkgdb.= c:2=3D > 266) > > *** Error code 70 > > > > Stop. > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Shall I open a PR? > > > > Thanks > > > > Anton >=20 > Why downgrading? Please upgrade again to 1.1.2 :) and report bug if any. >=20 > Sorry, I don't get you. >=20 > I need the ports tree to be at 319054. > I then do >=20 > pkg info -xd xorg-server > /root/xorg-dep > portmaster -f `cat /root/xorg-dep` >=20 > Is this not supported? You mean you went forward and switch back to a former version? yes Switching from 1.1 back to 1.0 has been taken in account during the pkg-dev= el phase, but not considered for after 1.1 is offically released which explain= s why you have this message. We could had the compatibility he really needed. Normal path is not to go backward :) ok, so what if I keep only ports-mgmt/pkg up to date, and leave the rest of the ports tree at 319054? Will this work, i.e. wil I be able to use pkg tools with older portmaster? Or maybe I need to keep both pkg and portmaster up to date? Will this work? Thanks Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201306251423.r5PENsE2016716>