Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:58:13 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a Soekris 4801 Message-ID: <74610.1119290293@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:30:16 PDT." <20050620173016.GB93634@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20050620173016.GB93634@dragon.NUXI.org>, "David O'Brien" writes: >On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:58:46AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: >> - Try to figure out how to better differentiate build vs. install time >> frobbing. For example, the NanoBSD NO_CXX concern: we want C++ >> applications, we just don't want to install the build chain. >> Currently, we have no way to differentiate these concepts, since our >> dependencies are entirely build-time, and our frobs have to match up >> (generally) between build and install. I.e., devd is built only if >> !NO_CXX, which is a build-time concern. > >Is NanoBSD split into a build and install phase like >buildworld/installworld? If so, can you try the equivalent of >'make buildworld && make -DNO_CXX installworld'? nanobsd basically calls buildworld and installworld, so that would be possible, provided the options work out that way. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?74610.1119290293>