Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:42:30 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, portsmaster@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Turning COMPAT_43TTY into a binary-only compatibility Message-ID: <200801291042.m0TAgU9C070678@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: <20080128225308.GT67081@hoeg.nl> References: <20080128225308.GT67081@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ed Schouten wrote: > Is there someone who wants to help me here? I'm too busy to review or help what you'r up to, sorry, but if your changes are the way FreeBSD is going, I have hardware that uses these: /usr/ports/comms/gnokii MAINTAINER=mad@madpilot.net /usr/ports/misc/estic Port by me, MAINTAINER=dinoex@FreeBSD.org /usr/ports/sysutils/nut MAINTAINER=Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de & if necessary ? I'll be able to test diffs occasionaly when necessary. (Hosts here run releasess & stable, but I could put up current when needed). Loads of people presumably similarly rely on serial port coms to various obscure Non PC hardware, Sometimes ports MAINTAINER= wont have hardware to test with (eg in case of misc/estic I think). Perhaps ports Makefiles might benefit from another variable with email of hardware tester[s] ? (thus cc'd suggestion to portsmaster@freebsd.org) -- Julian Stacey. Munich Computer Consultant, BSD Unix C Linux. http://berklix.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200801291042.m0TAgU9C070678>