Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:11:41 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Mario Lobo <mlobo@digiart.art.br> Subject: Re: Removal of GEOM_BSD, GEOM_MBR, GEOM_PC98 and GEOM_SUNLABEL (recap) Message-ID: <4806.1254046301@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:33:02 %2B0200." <3a142e750909270133q63062558tf7bab06006e05953@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3a142e750909270133q63062558tf7bab06006e05953@mail.gmail.com>, "Paul B. Mahol" writes: >geom_part* is going to be only partitioning interface in future. >So you should really forget about geom_bsd and geom_mbr and try all geom_part* >modules or if that do not work recreate partitioning table with gpart(8) I'm pretty certain that Mario has what was until recently a valid disk configuration which geom_part does not support. >Older modules are just buggy and provide no additional features. Apart of course from the historical modes not supported by geom_part and the fact that hot-spot'ing is not supported and so on... Lets stick with the facts, should we ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4806.1254046301>