Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 21:36:37 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm) Cc: grog@lemis.com, evanc@synapse.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what do you think ... should/could ports move to -> /usr/local/ports ? Message-ID: <199709082136.OAA10301@usr09.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <19970908080917.09111@klemm.gtn.com> from "Andreas Klemm" at Sep 8, 97 08:09:17 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> figure out ... 1048 or so entries in the root of /opt. > Even > /opt/<category_name>/<port_name>/bin > /lib > /include > /info > /man > /man/man1 > ... > > Would have the disadvantage to have many many bin subdirs and > youd have to symlink everything into a global > /opt/bin > /opt/include > /opt/lib > /opt/man > /opt/info Hmm. Not if you could support a "/opt/*/bin" or "/opt/*/*/bin" as a path entry. The idea being that the path hashing would expand it internally for you. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709082136.OAA10301>