Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 01:32:13 +0100 From: "Paul Richards" <paul@freebsd-services.com> To: "Robert Watson" <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, "Terry Lambert" <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org>, <developers@FreeBSD.org>, <hackers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Request for submissions: FreeBSD Bi-Monthly Development Status Report (fwd) Message-ID: <036201c22ebb$ba08dbe0$fd00000a@prawn> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020718200957.16080B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Watson" <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: "Terry Lambert" <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org>; <developers@FreeBSD.org>; <hackers@FreeBSD.org> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 1:18 AM Subject: Re: Request for submissions: FreeBSD Bi-Monthly Development Status Report (fwd) > tags, removal of a necessary tag, etc. If I had to guess, asking for > nroff/mdoc submissions would result in a slightly higher success rate, as > I suspect developers have a bit more experience with it, and also don't > have to install a port to get syntax checking. I wonder how true that is these days. The last time I used nroff was for my masters thesis which was in 1990! Does anyone except man page maintainers still use it in earnest? Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?036201c22ebb$ba08dbe0$fd00000a>