Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:37:05 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> To: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running bhyve on a AMD 1075T Phenom Message-ID: <525CF0A1.6060600@digiware.nl> In-Reply-To: <525C837E.7060302@freebsd.org> References: <5256D59A.20904@digiware.nl> <5256DD29.6090007@freebsd.org> <14A565E7-7D26-4C32-B73A-F5FAA16BC837@digiware.nl> <CALnRwMSO0jS-%2B--0GLc1eH0YVRwBPa-ed63DQe72v9Yc50ukpw@mail.gmail.com> <9A4BF6B0-91F1-43C5-B5D5-90486123336D@digiware.nl> <525738CE.9000708@freebsd.org> <CAG=rPVdJAuboZfNpiH-KCmM4WmSWtyWXPmx9XOC9iSGSYbSgRg@mail.gmail.com> <525C837E.7060302@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-10-15 1:51, Peter Grehan wrote: > Hi Craig, > >> There was a lot of non-trivial stuff done in the amd64 pmap code and the >> BHyve intel module >> for bhyve_npt_pmap, and these changes have not been made for the amd svm >> code. Right, I looked at it, and decided it was way easier to just run the svm tree > Yes, that's right. > >> Does anyone have patches for the svm code? > > Not yet - Anish is working on it. looking forward to test. --WjW
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?525CF0A1.6060600>