Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 20:17:10 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: FUJISHIMA Satsuki <sf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: multiple mtree files Message-ID: <20010108201710.L649@puck.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <86r92et97w.wl@cheerful.com>; from sf@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:22:11PM %2B0900 References: <200101041709.f04H9XU61344@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010104123312.G86630@argon.firepipe.net> <86r92et97w.wl@cheerful.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:22:11PM +0900, FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
> I'm under impression what you suggest here is the right way to
> go. share/locale is too common thing to be handled by each port
> nowadays and should be coverred by mtree as x11/kdelibs11 does.
Yes, this is correct.
> MTREE_ADD= /some/where/locale.dist
This var should be:
MTREE_FILES+= ${PORTSDIR}/Mtree/locale.dist
Satoshi?
> and that file will be merged with BSD.local.dist and/or BSD.x11.dist
> depends on its flavor. bento would just shut up. :-)
That is what I intend to do. :-)
> I think this is also useful for KDE, GNOME and their children.
Most probably.
> --- bsd.port.mk 2000/11/16 13:06:25 1.360
> +++ bsd.port.mk 2001/01/08 05:50:07
[...]
Satoshi had a bsd.port.mk patch to go with my patch to pkg_* to solve
this problem. I don't know what happened, but it was my understanding
that all it needed was another mtree file and MTREE_FILES+= added to a
few ports to test it.
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010108201710.L649>