Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:41:05 -0500
From:      "Michael Conlen" <meconlen@obfuscated.net>
To:        "Duraid" <latif2221@home.com>, "Tony Storm" <tplastics@hanginbrain.com>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: Linux or FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <NFBBJNNKKLIPPJPMCEAPIEAICDAA.meconlen@obfuscated.net>
In-Reply-To: <3AAC4830.48EE984E@home.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
there are a few other reasons to go with FreeBSD. My biggest complaint about
the Linux kernel is the networking stack. It seems to be Alan Cox's
playground. Now, I've got a lot of respect for Alan, but using the Linux
kernel as his playground results in a much less stable operating system. I
think the last time that happened with FreeBSD was the 3.x series. I recall
there were some network problems introduced there when some things in the
networking stack was reworked a bit, but Alan has a thing for ripping the
thing out and rebuilding it over and over again (what's he on, this third
one). In any case FreeBSD is based on BSD, and is much more stable. Granted
stable is a relative thing, but I've seen much less problems with FreeBSD
under heavy usage then I have with Linux at different points in it's cycle.

Duraid is correct about the different flavors of Linux, but BSD has their
own (NetBSD, FreeBSD, BSDI). On the other hand, things are a lot less
different between the BSD's then they are between the various Linux
distributions.

As always, for any application, get a firm understanding of your
appplications requirements, and examine what FreeBSD or a flavor of Linux
has to offer. Think about what you will do with it, what you will do a year
from now, five years from now. Did I mention how easy it is to upgrade
FreeBSD?

I used to be a Linux freak. My old slackware distributions blew Windows 3.11
out of the water. More recently I saw FreeBSD, I'm not going back.

--
Groove On Dude
Michael Conlen
Obfuscated Networking
meconlen@obfuscated.net


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Duraid
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 10:53 PM
> To: Tony Storm; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD
>
>
> go with freebsd .. when you ask questions you only get one answer..
> linux is not like that .. when you ask a linux question everybody goes
> ...oh well!  it depends... not because they don't want to help but this
> is the truth ... linux comes with different flavors and gives different
> solutions to different problems... and this is very confusing to a
> newbie... even if would like to choose linux don't go with redhat
> because you won't understand why all the fuss around linux.. it's not
> REALLY stable and not easy to use and with ton's of bugs.. why not use
> windows then?.. go with slackware (slackware.com).
>
> Duraid
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NFBBJNNKKLIPPJPMCEAPIEAICDAA.meconlen>