Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:56:44 -0700 From: James Earl <james@icionline.ca> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@niksun.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Radeon 9250 (was Re: Matrox G550) Message-ID: <1102096604.512.14.camel@serious.ab.hsia.telus.net> In-Reply-To: <200412011621.10090.jkim@niksun.com> References: <20041201120130.B680C16A4E8@hub.freebsd.org> <200412011534.25235.jkim@niksun.com> <1102021676.97315.5.camel@serious.ab.hsia.telus.net> <200412011621.10090.jkim@niksun.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 16:21 -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Thursday 02 December 2004 04:07 pm, James Earl wrote: > > Even though the radeon manpage doesn't list the 9250 (6.7.0), I was > > assuming the 9250 is basically the same as a 9200. Is this true? > > Yes. > > > Does your 9200 exhibit the same problems as Roland Smith describes? > > Fixed now and patch attached. BTW, I am using Xorg 6.8.0. I received my Radeon 9250 and applied your patch. No problems there. But, for some reason glxinfo is reporting: "direct rendering: No". Looking through /var/log/Xorg.0.log see I'm getting some drmOpenDevice errors and another earlier message to the tune of "(WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:1:0:1) found". http://www.icionline.ca/james/Xorg.0.log Any clues? James > > Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1102096604.512.14.camel>