Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:02:56 +1000 (EST)
From:      Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To:        "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
Cc:        Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Significant missing item in 11.0 release notes
Message-ID:  <20160802023424.W29054@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
In-Reply-To: <921fa5a6-5cbf-a7d4-3306-090d16195491@yandex.ru>
References:  <CAN6yY1t4CoG1DSN1bJJTfUxjQJxWR=k0Lr3gx0v0Wvu=LmMhpw@mail.gmail.com> <3b44dbc7-95c9-b529-c1a4-47a4af0774cf@yandex.ru> <20160802012633.X29054@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <921fa5a6-5cbf-a7d4-3306-090d16195491@yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:47:37 +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
 > On 01.08.16 18:43, Ian Smith wrote:
 > > Fast work Andrey, and sorry for rushing in.  I ASSumed, after reading 
 > > the new tables section in 11.0-R ipfw(8), that Kevin had run into:
 > > 
 > > 	Tables require explicit creation via create before use.
 > > 
 > > but diving - not too deeply - into the log of /head/sbin/ipfw/tables.c 
 > > from your commit, I think that statement must be out of date, at least 
 > > regarding existing ruleset table configuration?  Is that right?
 > 
 > If you want to use some new specific feature you need to create table
 > explicitly. But for old rules generic tables will be created
 > automatically (with warning).

Exactly how I was hoped it would work, thankyou ..

cheers, Ian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160802023424.W29054>