Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:37:27 +0200 From: "pobox@verysmall.org" <pobox@verysmall.org> To: pauls@utdallas.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When is BuildWorld necessary? Message-ID: <450D3377.6010306@verysmall.org> In-Reply-To: <E6D60374F5ABF4FF75A51AA3@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> References: <200609161541.38002.bob@tania.servebbs.org> <450C55FA.5070701@verysmall.org> <200609161639.47705.bob@tania.servebbs.org> <450CCC90.6000605@verysmall.org> <E6D60374F5ABF4FF75A51AA3@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
pauls@utdallas.edu wrote: > No one has mentioned the security/freebsd-update port. With that you > can apply updates to the kernel and world without having to build them > *if* (and only if!) you are running a GENERIC kernel. For remote > administration, this may be a good option for some. I read that this can be used _only_ nothing has been re-compiled locally, of have I missed something? We have custom kernel due to database needed optimizations. Iv.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?450D3377.6010306>