Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Feb 1998 06:27:07 GMT
From:      jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly)
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>, Adam Turoff <AdamT@smginc.com>, hackers <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, Robert Glover <rob@f-body.org>
Subject:   Re: Token Ring for FreeBSD yet?
Message-ID:  <34f4b8d8.6646364@mail.cetlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <19980225122411.62329@freebie.lemis.com>
References:  <34F37C2A@smginc.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980224192042.29916B-100000@duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us> <19980225122411.62329@freebie.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 25 Feb 1998 12:24:11 +1030, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> wrote:

>On a normal network, a 10Mbit Ethernet network could outrun a 16Mbit
>Token Ring network, simply because of the token-passing scheme that
>Token Ring uses.

>token passing isn't very efficient under any kind of load.

Can you back this up with performance test data?

It doesn't jive at all with test results Tolly published several years
ago in Data Communications.  He said token ring would run at full 16mb
wire speed while Ethernet would degrade to 7mb because of collisions.

--
The day of the proprietary OS is over.  Long live freed software.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34f4b8d8.6646364>