Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:51:11 -0600
From:      Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Chris H <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>, ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] Upcoming change in dependency registration
Message-ID:  <54C17EDF.40908@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <54C17E8B.1060400@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20150122180912.GE81001@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <7996d75b9d724f65af7dd3f63033eb03@ultimatedns.net> <54C17E8B.1060400@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--gEAKVq8r2rR5uLpWxefotPU3gOQkJvhLs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 1/22/2015 4:49 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>=20
> And in general, the ports tree is a single snapshot. It's only supporte=
d
> to build a port using the exact Mk/ it was checked-in as.

For the record, I don't like this at all. It's one of my biggest gripes
about the ports framework. That's a separate discussion though.

--=20
Regards,
Bryan Drewery


--gEAKVq8r2rR5uLpWxefotPU3gOQkJvhLs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUwX7fAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPaBYH/iBgSuDfZrE3sedkcvaV2ivP
pvpML5B+xhIavoBv1kntnIR5teh/6IEFSqaQqY2jOy5L4c8lQbUtfrS4glTd6EVh
UTgXVlU04QbHY9bpr/kYzHGvOGW3qcrdqZUIZnx5/bytuB+ZlonJe6JNy2YtV4ub
3hJJjqfqV/0n6JJP6YvPupSLMpEl71l1v5zNjX63J3y3Afrcs83XYWUmSG0olQh8
a7XLicZyt510fAS5p4tiHbDcoYTN3/52k3rQfAjVFjytDtMiXcrW/zi9Z0Ecsn2K
wzteWxYf19c7ZFHn4G90qSIIXRzLoEMVWl0dSQQhBr5r1QLpRPj8fNKDgh6qwxM=
=nG2n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gEAKVq8r2rR5uLpWxefotPU3gOQkJvhLs--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54C17EDF.40908>