Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 10:54:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Tiemann <btman@ugcs.caltech.edu> To: michael dorin <mike@chaski.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: apache with perl mods Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9807271047140.23011-100000@lionking.org> In-Reply-To: <199807270910.JAA01113@chaski.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Jul 1998, michael dorin wrote: > Anybody using the version of apache with the perl modules built in? > How does it work? Is it fairly fast? Any security issues? > Is it stable? I'm running it on www.lionking.org ... it's very fast, very stable, and has support via mailing-list just like this place. :) If you have a lot of little perl things that run repeatedly, it's a godsend. It's a little bit annoying to build-- you extract apache in its own location, then compile apache from within the mod_perl extraction directory. This means you can't really build apache from the ports collection. Security isn't really an issue, any more than it is with standard CGI. How secure you make your scripts is an implementation problem, not a design problem. :) Downsides: As each apache process accumulates mod_perl registry scripts, it grows. I've got each process sucking up about 2MB of RAM on my machine, which isn't trivial on a 50-httpd-process server. This should all become much nicer in the 2.0 series of apache, which will work towards a threaded model like they're using for the Win32 port. mod_perl can be a bear to work with, but I'm very happy with the results. Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9807271047140.23011-100000>