Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:06:56 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> To: sbruno@freebsd.org Cc: "pyunyh@gmail.com" <pyunyh@gmail.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, bde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bge(4) sysctl tuneables -- a blast from the past. Message-ID: <20130413200512.G1165@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <1365781568.1418.1.camel@localhost> References: <1365781568.1418.1.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Sean Bruno wrote: > http://markmail.org/message/brpfcifnf2742pff > > So, these never happened. *sigh* > > I think they should. Any objections? FreeBSD has too many knobs, but it would be nice if the bge defaults weren't so broken, so that they don't need overriding. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130413200512.G1165>