Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:54:42 +0200 From: hans@lambermont.dyndns.org (Hans Lambermont) To: Clint Olsen <clint.olsen@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Openoffice.org-2-RC and bison conflicts Message-ID: <20070619065442.GH82653@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20070618225901.GA35682@0lsen.net> References: <20070618225901.GA35682@0lsen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Clint Olsen wrote: > I'm trying to install openoffice, and some sub-portion of the port is > installing bison2, and later it tries to install bison and then it > complains about conflicting ports. How is one supposed to deal with > sub-port conflicts like these? Why do we /ever/ allow ports to have > conflicts with other ports? That seems broken from the start. I agree :-) See my proposal (2 Jun 2007 entry) at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=100358&cat=ports regards, Hans Lambermont
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070619065442.GH82653>