Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 08:01:51 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Alie Tan <alie@affle.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DragonFly vs FreeBSD scheduler Message-ID: <509531DF.6050108@mu.org> In-Reply-To: <CANuCnH9b20NxDpmzPdE2tdEFCTx7a4u_TvvEJNc0J4yCbDm%2Biw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANuCnH9b20NxDpmzPdE2tdEFCTx7a4u_TvvEJNc0J4yCbDm%2Biw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/3/12 6:18 AM, Alie Tan wrote: > Hi, > > No offence, just curious about scheduler and its functionality. > > What is the different between this two that makes FreeBSD performance far > behind DragonFly BSD? http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release32/ Looks like a few specific benchmarks that DragonFly aimed to do well at that we were unawares of. Not sure, didn't see DragonFly sharing the results with us until this paper was published although I may have missed that. -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?509531DF.6050108>