Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:28:04 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: mike@sentex.net Cc: vas@mpeks.tomsk.su, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange behavior of restore(8) Message-ID: <4ea66504.s5gqntrPXpc5ddTl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4EA5765C.20701@sentex.net> References: <20111021110600.GA19417@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <CAHhngE3Oub-36fE_X4eT_4r8LygQ7D1dbcWjdTn3KCeE95J9uQ@mail.gmail.com> <20111022053315.GA30712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20111023161312.GA46735@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20111023162242.GA3823@tinyCurrent> <20111024122448.GA70524@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110240753500.69508@wonkity.com> <20111024141404.GA71953@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4EA5765C.20701@sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote: > if there are a lot of files, restore needs quite a bit of RAM. It might need less to "extract" (restore -x) than to "restore" (restore -r) -- but that only works if there's no need to load an incremental afterwards.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ea66504.s5gqntrPXpc5ddTl%perryh>