Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:20:15 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org> To: "oldfart@gtonet" <oldfart@gtonet.net> Cc: "freebsd-security@FreeBSD. ORG" <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Donation For Earthquake Relief Work Message-ID: <20010331092015.K97985@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <BIEHKEFNHFMMJEKCDMLNIEBHCHAA.oldfart@gtonet.net> References: <20010331083931.I97985@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <BIEHKEFNHFMMJEKCDMLNIEBHCHAA.oldfart@gtonet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
oldfart@gtonet wrote: > No, I'm not joking. While you have to go online to get mail you could also > visit the forum. Not as quickly as I can download all my mail to read offline. > Surely you do browse the web anyway? Yes, when I have something specific to look for. I don't want to have to do it all the time just to read mail. > As for searching, IE and Netscape also have a "find" (find in page or > find on this page) feature. Welcome to the 21st century. Do they allow as complex searches as Mutt does? I doubt it. Does the "find" feature of the browser search all posts in a particular group? No, it would just search the currently displayed post, or whatever. Would a server-side search function to do that work offline? No. These are just some of the reasons web interfaces to mailing lists suck. The fact that most browsers are unreliable pieces of shit is another. > I don't know that SPAM isn't a security concern. I don't want spammers on or > using my network. Does that make it on-topic for -security? Not really. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010331092015.K97985>