Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:09:31 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> Cc: bv@wjv.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Native SATA vs. PATA-emulation - differnce? Message-ID: <464E07FB.1070008@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <1179504480.1234.5.camel@zoot.mintel.co.uk> References: <20070518150932.DE90D16A500@hub.freebsd.org> <20070518153315.GA79307@wjv.com> <1179504480.1234.5.camel@zoot.mintel.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Evans wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:33 -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote: > .... >>> acd0: CDROM <CD-224E-N/1.AA> at ata0-slave UDMA33 >>> ad4: DMA limited to UDMA33, device found non-ATA66 cable >> *********************************************************** >> >> That's why you are only getting UDMA33. Change the cable if it's >> not correct. You might also try changing from P-ATA emulation if >> that's possible. >> >> .... >> >> Bill > > IIRC almost all SATA cables are non-ATA66 cables.... SATA has no concept of ATA33, ATA66, etc. The message from the driver means nothing for this case. The solution to the original poster's question has already been answered, I believe. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?464E07FB.1070008>