Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 09:52:11 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: A G F Keahan <ak@freenet.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Optimal UFS parameters Message-ID: <59514.976179131@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2000 00:31:00 PST." <20001207003100.J16205@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20001207003100.J16205@fw.wintelcom.net>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >I'd do it, but I don't really have a grasp on the optimal parameters >to set based on FS size. So far I don't see any indication here (or elsewhere) that anybody has that grasp. I guess that is really a testimony to FFS/UFS's qualites... The main thing is that you significantly reduce your fsck time if you reduce the number of inodes. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59514.976179131>