Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:49:34 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Luigi Iannone <Luigi.Iannone@uclouvain.be> Cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, Olivier Bonaventure <olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenLISP Message-ID: <488396CE.1060008@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4711A2FE-DFB4-44C0-9FA6-D69BD1B05C2E@uclouvain.be> References: <AAC239F7-5483-4C9A-9C7B-FC4DF524EDB7@uclouvain.be> <488384E5.3060608@elischer.org> <200807202051.04431.max@love2party.net> <4711A2FE-DFB4-44C0-9FA6-D69BD1B05C2E@uclouvain.be>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Iannone wrote: >> > > Hi, > > >> A word about the implementation. The interception mechanism for LISP >> tunneled packets in ip_input/forward is *horrible*! Some of that is due >> to the design, but I believe it can be implemented much cleaner if you >> were to use the pfil(9) API. I'd really like to avoid putting this kind >> of stuff into the main ip code as it hurts readability a lot. >> > > Thanks for the hint I'll get a look at that. my head hurts after reading that :-) I think I only 'got' half of it.. I'll read it again later.. The aim of this is to reduce routing table size and allow multihoming with the destination being able to suggest to a remote sight how to route back to it right? > > Cheers > > Luigi > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?488396CE.1060008>