Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Oct 1999 10:16:17 -0400
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, Luoqi Chen <luoqi@watermarkgroup.com>
Cc:        wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, imp@village.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/aic aic.c
Message-ID:  <19991028101617.29808@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <199910280258.UAA13232@panzer.kdm.org>; from Kenneth D. Merry on Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 08:58:39PM -0600
References:  <199910271540.LAA04366@lor.watermarkgroup.com> <199910280258.UAA13232@panzer.kdm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 27 October 1999 at 20:58:39 -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> Luoqi Chen wrote...
>>>>> In message <199910262211.PAA94274@freefall.freebsd.org> Luoqi Chen writes:
>>>>> :   Enable tagged queueing (should it be spelled as queuing?) by default.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>> http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk/elt/dictionary/cmd_search.asp?key=queue*1+0&dict=b
>>>
>>>> They spell it 'queueing'.  I suppose it can be spelled either way.
>>>
>>> The relevant question in this case is, how does the SCSI standard
>>> spell it?
>>>
>> Good point! It is 'queuing' in the X3T9.2/375 draft I have :-)
>
> We should probably just leave it as "you can spell it either way",
> otherwise I'm sure someone will feel an uncontrollable urge to change all
> occurrences of one spelling to the other in the tree.  (Thus the reason I
> even bothered to point out you can spell it two different ways.)

Agreed.  This is the point I've been making.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991028101617.29808>