Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 12:49:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> Cc: Pavol Adamec <pavol_adamec@tempest.sk>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007271247130.58787-100000@snafu.adept.org> In-Reply-To: <200007270800.SAA23526@cairo.anu.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Darren Reed wrote: > IP Filter 4.0 will change that quite dramatically :-) What's the best place to go see a relatively thorough (unbiased would be nice too) comparison between the two? I.e. some webpage with a column of IPFW 'features' vs. a column of ipf 'features' or examples of rulesets doing the same thing for each showing one is/isn't more efficient... The only real reason I've heard ipf reccomended since ipfw got keep-state/check-state is ipnat. -mrh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007271247130.58787-100000>