Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 14:41:33 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, dfr@FreeBSD.ORG, romanp@wuppy.rcs.ru Subject: Re: Problems with nfsstat and dynamic OID Message-ID: <16366.919604493@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 21 Feb 1999 13:32:57 GMT." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902211322320.82049-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902211322320.82049-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>, Do ug Rabson writes: >Since >sysctlbyname exists and is obviously a better mechanism for reading the >variable (based on code complexity), then why not use it? I support this. It was the intention of sysctlbyname() to minimize the use of "well-known-OIDs" as much as possible. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16366.919604493>