Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Apr 2000 20:59:48 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday 
Message-ID:  <45655.956516388@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 23 Apr 2000 11:55:08 PDT." <200004231855.LAA63309@apollo.backplane.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200004231855.LAA63309@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon writes:

>    There's another good reason to MFC the linux patch on wednesday... 
>    that is, to do it at the same time the SMP cleanup is MFC'd, and that
>    is because both patch sets require the linux kernel module to be 
>    recompiled and I'd rather not force people to do that twice. 

Matt, this is not a valid reason either.

Unless there is *urgent* and *overriding* reasons, and that basically
means that the security-officer says so, all changes must be shaken
out in -current first.

That's just the way it is Matt.  Get used to it.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45655.956516388>