Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:47:23 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention. Message-ID: <4D1077AB.4010707@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinRGx-r-MpusXecTpjKbwAUHktM6qPxRxz1B8DX@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=z1_KWKmhqFjNYHZfgAyPgsUVvgJ0P29KOPpnZ@mail.gmail.com> <20101211215341.0000097c@unknown> <AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com> <20101213103535.00005f3d@unknown> <4D061E00.7050606@freebsd.org> <AANLkTinJrCRscZwYCAwXERTs6X=-yaz6go3FTSmc6Zdx@mail.gmail.com> <4D0F3AD6.9080002@freebsd.org> <AANLkTikkpbJV0v1=mBc%2BnFBh_diyAjUjaN8BUKwEZZhp@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinRGx-r-MpusXecTpjKbwAUHktM6qPxRxz1B8DX@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 21/12/2010 11:27 Artem Belevich said the following: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> It would be nice to get the i386 counterpart too when this goes into the tree. >> >> Here's updated version that has syscall:linux32 working on i386, too. >> >> https://sites.google.com/site/abc678site/files/dt-systrace-20101221.patch.gz > > Forgot to mention. The patch is against stable/8 r216436 The previous version applied fine to head, I think that that should be the case with this version too. I have one comment though. I am not sure about renaming syscall.ko to syscall_freebsd.ko. Perhaps we could keep the old name? Or add a new module under that name that would load native syscall module and all emulation syscall modules (if any)? -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D1077AB.4010707>