Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 22:11:38 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: startslip isn't just broken - it's EVIL! Message-ID: <199510240411.WAA24768@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <VoSl5ZmyV1@ache.dialup.demos.ru> References: <199510240302.MAA04077@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> <VoSl5ZmyV1@ache.dialup.demos.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ startslip bugs and other non-intuitiveness ] > >Guys! Use slattach and chat, and save yourselves the stress 8) > > It is taste question. When I got my slip, I was trying to use > slattach first, but switched to startslip, slattach works unstable for me. > Startslip is better structured and not do anything in signal handlers. Again, it's a taste question. I'm just finishing up my very simple slattach addtions and will send it to Jordan for his perusal. Unfortunately, the new sysconfig setup has made it a bit more difficult to edit 'one file' as I could do in 2.0, but it is still a piece of cake to make slattach and chat work with very little work. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510240411.WAA24768>