Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Dec 2000 23:56:54 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: is it possible to have a NULL procp for an NFS request?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012222356080.74167-100000@beppo.feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <5lu27vlgz0.fsf@assaris.sics.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I'm pretty sure that the server had no symlinks in that filesystem.

On 23 Dec 2000, Assar Westerlund wrote:

> Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> writes:
> > Hmm. The client wasn't following symlinks.
> 
> You sure?  What happens is when you queue up an nfs operation provoked
> by following a symlink.  I couldn't figure any other way of making
> that happen.
> 
> > The patch seems simple enough, but it probably shouldn't just
> > swallow the error.
> 
> Yeah, your patch to subr_prf.c is better.

Well, it covers more. Sigh. Just pluggin' holes....



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0012222356080.74167-100000>