Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 17:32:29 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/net/openldap20-* and sendmail Message-ID: <4096660D.5090602@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040503151100.GA16961@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> References: <200405031338.i43DceZX018352@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040503151100.GA16961@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Kennedy wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 06:38:40AM -0700, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >> Removed files: >> net/openldap20-client Makefile >> net/openldap20-server Makefile ... >> Log: >> removed EOL version of OpenLDAP > > I haven't finished tracking it down because of priorities, but I've had > some problems on 5.2.1 with sendmail and later OpenLDAP client software > (> 2.0). When linked against sendmail (LDAP-enabled, so obviously not > stock), it won't pass some of the tests. > > I'm going on notes, so bear with me a bit. > > On 3/30 (a bit ago), it looked to me like there may have been a library > incompatibility and just linking sendmail against openldap was causing it > to fail its self tests (during the build). Sendmail was playing some games > with timers (their own copy of "sleep", for example) and my thought was > that there was some incompatible itimer stuff going on between the two in > later versions of the LDAP libraries. > > I just never got a chance to chase it down all the way and propose > patches. Do you know if this affects other operating systems as well?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4096660D.5090602>