Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Jul 1999 19:11:33 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
To:        Peter Jeremy <jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/release/sysinstall tcpip.c 
Message-ID:  <5505.932695893@zippy.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Jul 1999 07:27:50 %2B1000." <99Jul23.070924est.40350@border.alcanet.com.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I _really_ think that this is a furphy.  Not having BPF doesn't buy
> you any additional security - it's just too easy to sniff the
> network from a Windoze PC.  Typically /dev/bpf*  only allows root
> access - and if someone undesirable has root access, you have more
> pressing problems.

Tell it to the network security folks, like Garrett Wollman (hi!), who
scream like stuck pigs every time the subject of putting bpf in the
kernel is raised, not me. :)

> Iff you believe that the mere presence of BPF is a security hole, then

I actually share your opinion about the proper defense against
sniffing being proper network design (use switches/vlans/etc) and
not turning off bpf, but I'm not the one you need to convince here. :-)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5505.932695893>