Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:46:46 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bandwidth limiting for eMule ports Message-ID: <200401220546.i0M5kkPf018458@apollo.backplane.com> References: <6.0.1.1.2.20040122120552.0293bd20@202.179.0.80> <200401221512.49260.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oops... sorry, I gave bad advise. I'm looking at the code. It recognizes
'K' or 'k' so your specification was right. It's the 'b' verses 'B' that
it's sensitive to, so if you say: kbytes/sec it will think it's kbits/sec,
and if you say kBits/sec it will think it's kBytes/sec.
One thing I have noticed, however, is that the ipfw pipes seem rather
sensitive to configuration changes, especially if there are packets
already in the pipe. I've never been able to pin it down.
-Matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401220546.i0M5kkPf018458>