Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 09:51:23 +1000 From: Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: virenp@mail.utexas.edu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Aide port broken in 5.4? Message-ID: <1117065083.861.2.camel@dirk.no.domain> In-Reply-To: <20596114@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <3578.146.6.135.76.1116702794.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <20648162@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <43618.146.6.178.5.1117033514.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <1117034205.1821.28.camel@dirk.no.domain> <41326.146.6.178.5.1117038317.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <20596114@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 20:44 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:25:17 -0500 (CDT) Viren Patel wrote: > > > pkg_info on the 5.3 system says it's Aide-0.10_1. The > > Makefile says is 0.10_1. The Makefiles on both are the > > same except for the Makefile version number and the BROKEN > > line in the 5.4. Running "aide --version" on both 5.3 and > > 5.4 reports 0.10. So I am not sure what's going on here. > > As I understand part 5.2.2.1 "PORT REVISION" of the Porter's Handbook > if a port got to have marked as BROKEN, there is no reason to change > the port_revision_number. And the same is when the port is got to be > unmarked. Yes, bad choice of words on my part. I should have said you probably have different Makefile versions, which is what I meant.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1117065083.861.2.camel>