Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:30:14 GMT From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/156172: security/barnyard2 does not need security/snort to run Message-ID: <201104041630.p34GUEJ4023602@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/156172; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/156172: security/barnyard2 does not need security/snort to run Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:27:40 -0500 --On April 4, 2011 8:50:16 AM -0500 Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Maintainer of security/barnyard2, > > Please note that PR ports/156172 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/156172 Sheesh. Sound the idiot alarm. The patch I sent doesn't accomplish what the OP requested at all. His patch works fine by removing the RUN_DEPENDS for snort. I need to decide if I want to add snort to the OPTIONS (as well as suricata), so put this on hold while I think this through more carefully. -- Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201104041630.p34GUEJ4023602>