Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 06:40:12 -0800 From: Joe Kelsey <joek@mail.flyingcroc.net> To: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WARNING: portupgrade considered harmful Message-ID: <3E64BACC.2070607@mail.flyingcroc.net> In-Reply-To: <m3znobubfh.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <3E5FB1F8.4050405@mail.flyingcroc.net> <3E5FD22B.3040904@mail.flyingcroc.net> <200302282148.h1SLm8pc031639@vashon.polstra.com> <3E5FEE23.8050403@mail.flyingcroc.net> <200303010232.h212WkFj000353@vashon.polstra.com> <1046491234.458.53.camel@zircon> <m3znobubfh.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthias Andree wrote: > > Is the dlopen()-vs.-ld.so issue something that can easily be solved at > all? My ignorant view is that dlopen() is userspace and ls.so rtld elf > whatever reeks of half-kernel half-user. > dlopen resides inside rtld-elf.so. They are *both* userland entities. /Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E64BACC.2070607>