Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:08:29 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Common Lisp on FreeBSD Message-ID: <20050411000829.GA29762@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <441x9l8gon.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <20050408133347.GB1809@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <441x9l8gon.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:51:52AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: : Depends on what you're doing. Other than clisp, the Common Lisp : implementations in ports are pretty much all derived from the same : origin (the CMU implementation), so you might as well just try them : and see what you like; the technical differences shouldn't be that : big. [That's ignoring the "embeddable" one, but I wouldn't recommend : that for learning.] I think I've decided to stick with clisp for now, until I find a reason to change. The REPL seems nicer, for one thing. : Or maybe you should consider Scheme... but that's another holy war. No thanks. I've had enough of those. :-) Say, have you fooled around with any clisp GUI toolkits? jm --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050411000829.GA29762>