Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 23:44:14 -0500 From: Jon Hamilton <hamilton@pobox.com> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: obrien@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Archive pruning Message-ID: <20000425044415.066A7156@woodstock.monkey.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 Apr 2000 21:07:03 CDT." <00042421070302.09767@nomad.dataplex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <00042421070302.09767@nomad.dataplex.net>, Richard Wackerbarth wrote } > > Do we really need 5 year old history? } > } > Yes. } I don't disagree that we need to maintain the history. } } I do, however, question the policy that REQUIRES EVERYONE to maintain that } much history. I've been following this thread at some distance for a while, and I don't understand your definition of ``everyone''. Aside from developers, who do you feel is a good candidate to track the entire CVS repository, rather than using CVSUP or some other method to get only the tree they are interested in? I'm not trying to be snide; it's possible that I'm missing some element of your argument, but I think using the term ``everyone'' is overstating the case considerably. -- Jon Hamilton hamilton@pobox.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000425044415.066A7156>