Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:11:06 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
Cc:        freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: imaze-xview-1.4 failed on i386 7]
Message-ID:  <20060201011106.GA19325@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <200602010202.48096.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
References:  <20060131213648.GA15350@xor.obsecurity.org> <200601312337.28476.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <20060131230440.GA17290@xor.obsecurity.org> <200602010202.48096.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:02:46AM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 00:04, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:37:27PM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 31 January 2006 22:36, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > OK, next problem..a bunch of ports are leaving behind the following
> > > > directory.  Should it be the port's responsibility to clean it up?
> > >
> > > Probably not of each one of these. Imake uses this directory and it
> > > cleans it up. Also a couple of ports use it to install their imake
> > > configs. In this case it would probably be x11-toolkits/xview, not
> > > games/imaze itself. I'll check if adding it to xview plist fixes this.
> >
> > That looks reasonable, all the other affected ports depend on xview.
> > The only thing to check is that xview is the package that created this
> > directory also (e.g. installed a file inside it and implicitly created
> > the directory in the case when it was not already present).
>=20
> I can't seem to get this error on tinderbox so I'm not sure this would fi=
x it.=20
> The change to xview plist is necessary though. I'm also a bit puzzled why=
=20
> pointyhat didn't complain on test run.

It's only hilighted by a very recent change I made to pointyhat, which
is why both of the above are happening.

> Should revision of xview be bumped for=20
> addition of this directory in plist or can you somehow test before if thi=
s is=20
> really the culprit? The change I had in mind is:

I can test that, and it should have a revision bump since the package
needs to be rebuilt in order for other packages to be fixed.

Thanks,
Kris

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFD4AqqWry0BWjoQKURAn/EAKCFP939xfHIBuAs+fvSeoU6L85uIgCgpJJz
782pDQnPxGoIzYf/mFCCHqw=
=OcTn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060201011106.GA19325>