Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:11:24 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> Cc: obrien@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: One more question (different now) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005100910590.47945-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <200005092342.QAA20940@mass.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > > The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was > > > that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options. > > > > Or we should just delete it from the options. > > Ugh. I don't actually like that, because it serves a valid purpose. > What irritates me mostly is just that there is no way of casting a > volatile object into a non-volatile type, so you can't implement any sort > of conditional volatility exclusion. You can suppress the warning if you cast to uintptr_t first. Pretty ugly though. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 20 8442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005100910590.47945-100000>