Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:31:33 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        secmgr <security@jim-liesl.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic
Message-ID:  <20051207003133.GA81935@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <43962B8E.1090407@jim-liesl.org>
References:  <200512051518.43896.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> <20051206120026.GC62078@ip.net.ua> <200512061148.01012.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> <200512061320.45584.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> <20051206212850.GA79286@xor.obsecurity.org> <43960445.4050202@jim-liesl.org> <20051206214613.GA79648@xor.obsecurity.org> <43962B8E.1090407@jim-liesl.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:23:42PM -0700, secmgr wrote:

> >>>Update to 5.4 before trying to update to 6.0.
> >>>
> >>>Kris
> >>>    =20
> >>>
> >>So is there any supported direct 5.3->6.0 upgrade path, or is a stop in=
=20
> >>5.4 ville manditory now.?
> >>  =20
> >>
> >
> >I tried to say that you have to update to 5.4 before you can update to
> >6.0, i.e. updates from older versions are not supported.  It may be
> >easier to do a binary upgrade (i.e. download release media and use the
> >upgrade option).
> >
> >Kris
> >=20
> >
> Not to belabour this, but the 6.0 release notes do specificly say 5.3=20
> RELEASE and newer.

You're right, as others have also pointed out.

> "Source upgrades to FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE are only supported from FreeBSD=
=20
> 5.3-RELEASE or later. Users of older systems wanting to upgrade=20
> 6.0-RELEASE will need to update to FreeBSD 5.3 or newer first, then to=20
> FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE."
>=20
> This is one of my pet peeves with FreeBSD.  You can read the Release=20
> Notes, the UPDATING, the ERRATA, the HARDWARE, thinking you've prepped=20
> yourself for the upgrade, and still be screwed.  If RE wants to change=20
> the requirements for upgrading, then how bleeping hard would it be to=20
> update either release notes or errata.

This didn't happen here, so you don't need to be upset at RE.

Kris
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDli1lWry0BWjoQKURAi2OAKDX/bc1R0/BtCVuXU2of6F//QMGjACg2jkz
RVq9L069+sWKzf13zydw1bQ=
=k9uZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051207003133.GA81935>