Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:32:43 -0700
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Samba updates into STABLE?
Message-ID:  <20000426113243.A4673@orion.ac.hmc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004261322250.13441-100000@accord.grasslake.net>; from swb@grasslake.net on Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 01:25:18PM -0500
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004261322250.13441-100000@accord.grasslake.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 01:25:18PM -0500, Shawn Barnhart wrote:
> How long does it generally take for updates to Samba to make it into the
> stable tree?
> 
> I'm curious if RELENG_3 will have 2.0.7 anytime soon -- it fixes some Win2k
> annoyances that are present in 2.0.6.
> 
> The fixes are really to annoyances, its not totally broken.  I'm more
> curious how long a new port like samba does take to make it into the RELEASE
> branch.
> 
> (If this is question for ports instead of Stable, my apologies.)

This was a ports question.  Ports are in no way tyed to stable.  We now
tag ports for releases, but ports are not branched.  You'll want to
update your ports tree (or part of it) and get the new samba that way
(assuming the port has been updated).

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000426113243.A4673>