Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Jul 2000 23:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, ogud@tislabs.com
Subject:   Re: MFC'ing OpenSSL 0.9.5a?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007272304270.16821-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000727120843.95802A-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Robert Watson wrote:

> A co-worker of mine pointed out that FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE shipped with
> OpenSSL 0.9.4, which apparently causes problems for BIND9 due to API
> changes between versions, and bugs in 0.9.4.  FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT appears
> to be using OpenSSL 0.9.5a; I was wondering if there were any plans to MFC
> the new version of OpenSSL?  Of course, people only bring these things up
> after releases, but it would be nice to have it in the immediate -STABLE
> upgrade path, and in time for the November post-RSA-patent release. 

Several people had weird problems with 0.9.5a which I could never
reproduce or track down - this made me nervous to merge it. If I had some
success stories of people who have successfully run SSL webservers using
it in -current it might ease my fears somewhat :-)

Kris

--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007272304270.16821-100000>