Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:28:54 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network pipes Message-ID: <20030725122854.GJ22295@spc.org> In-Reply-To: <20030724215127.GA2027@ussenterprise.ufp.org> References: <20030724194228.P65000-100000@foem> <3F203807.6010805@acm.org> <20030724215127.GA2027@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 05:51:27PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:48:23PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > Another approach would be to add a new option to SSH > > so that it could encrypt only the initial authentication, > > then pass data unencrypted after that. This would > > go a long way to addressing the performance concerns. > > ssh -c none? > > Note, you don't want to use password authentication in this case, but > public key should still be ok. I have patches for this, they may be a little out-of-date: http://www.incunabulum.com/code/patches/openssh/ http://www.incunabulum.com/code/patches/openssl/ BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030725122854.GJ22295>